Shaking my head. That entire response is the sportsman's equivalent of "Orange Man Bad". What the State is doing isn't working, you can't come up with a specific reason for this perceived decline or a solution to it....but we just gotta do something anyway.the reason our limits are so small is our fishery isn't as strong as it could be. Same is happening to my brother in LA, they're getting ready to lower their trout limits from 25/15. Their flounder limit is 10, reds are 5.
commercial fisherman should be making bank considering the physical resources of our sounds and rivers, but the whole thing is a mess.
Shaking my head. That entire response is the sportsman's equivalent of "Orange Man Bad". What the State is doing isn't working, you can't come up with a specific reason for this perceived decline or a solution to it....but we just gotta do something anyway.
You want to make a positive impact on our fisheries? Put a moratorium on these massive encroachments being built at the very edge of our estuaries. Monitor and fine the hell out of any homeowner, subdivision, or municipality whose sewage and runoff hits our waters. We have massive spills and coastal waters with swimming advisories regularly. If it's harmful to people you can't make me believe it's not affecting the fishery.
not that I think inshore trawling is a GOOD thing, but banning it won’t bring the grass back either. We’ve had grass since we’ve had trawling, and in areas that wasn’t trawled, but it’s still disappearing. Can’t tell me that’s a good thing.
Shaking my head. You can’t do better than compare me to the orange man bad folks.
I don’t disagree with your second paragraph. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t look at other problems.
Have you not noticed the trout rules?
Then you're talking to the wrong guy. I have no inclination toward eliminating the commercial fishery.
It's pretty easy to scroll up and actually read my original post without saying I said we eliminate nets. I said inshore.
...and in the actual post you replied too didn't say there is no other way.
might be a better discussion if we stick to the topic, facts, and data.
What's wrong with the trout rules?
You do know how we got stuck with the 4 speck limit dont ya?Oops. Flounder rules.
but since you mention it, the trout rules have too small a limit.
You do know how we got stuck with the 4 speck limit dont ya?
I agree . I've seen the waters I grew up on clamming and oystering be closed to harvest because of water quality. I was recently talking with a shellfish biologist and he stated that Brunswick county should be broke from paying fines but has never heard of a fine imposed. Seems no one gives a damn about the water . Down here it's all about development no matter the cost to the resourcesShaking my head. That entire response is the sportsman's equivalent of "Orange Man Bad". What the State is doing isn't working, you can't come up with a specific reason for this perceived decline or a solution to it....but we just gotta do something anyway.
You want to make a positive impact on our fisheries? Put a moratorium on these massive encroachments being built at the very edge of our estuaries. Monitor and fine the hell out of any homeowner, subdivision, or municipality whose sewage and runoff hits our waters. We have massive spills and coastal waters with swimming advisories regularly. If it's harmful to people you can't make me believe it's not affecting the fishery.
you aint talked to many have you?I'm sure they exist, but I've never met a recreational fisherman that wants commercial fishermen gone.
(greenpeace, et al are a different story)
I agree . I've seen the waters I grew up on clamming and oystering be closed to harvest because of water quality. I was recently talking with a shellfish biologist and he stated that Brunswick county should be broke from paying fines but has never heard of a fine imposed. Seems no one gives a damn about the water . Down here it's all about development no matter the cost to the resources
I agree . I've seen the waters I grew up on clamming and oystering be closed to harvest because of water quality. I was recently talking with a shellfish biologist and he stated that Brunswick county should be broke from paying fines but has never heard of a fine imposed. Seems no one gives a damn about the water . Down here it's all about development no matter the cost to the resources
Yep alot comes down the cape fear from inland . The waters I was speaking of is another river however. The biologist told me he couldn't believe the county was allowed to build sewage spray fields beside the tributaries flowing into the river. I just asked " you ain't from around here are you? " He responded no and said whoever designed it wasn't either. I pointed across the river and said a local lives there part time now, he moved when he sold that land to the county for the spray fields. Dude was really disappointed at the water quality in the river.It isn’t just Brunswick though. How much nitrogen, etc. are all of us in the Piedmont sending downstream? Everyone loves to pnt fingers at the farmers, but every farmer I’ve known for years wants to minimize expense on any applications and meters it best they can.
Meanwhile Freddy Fescue in the burbs is burning a hole in his wallet to keep his lawn green and weed free. (Don’t get me wrong, I love a nice Bermuda yard, but I’m not going for the Augusta National look here!). Also, does the once a quarter beach mansion really need a putting green for a yard? While on the one hand you stabilize the sand on the other you get huge beach erosion.
Not to mention everything else that runs off from our parking lots, etc. There’s a lot to be said for grave roads, sand yards, and oyster shell driveways from the old days. At least when I was a kid, we could surf after it rained. Our place in Walton County FL is now a giant resort, paved from end to end.
I’m a ranty old man today.
It's like that with all the beach towns. I got tickled about all the homeowners in Southern Shores that got they're panties in a bundle about the "mini hotels". There were a couple houses built that maximized the number of bedrooms and they whined to end about how much pollution the septic tanks were going to release during a storm. Completely oblivious to their septic tank doing that everytime there's a good rain.I agree . I've seen the waters I grew up on clamming and oystering be closed to harvest because of water quality. I was recently talking with a shellfish biologist and he stated that Brunswick county should be broke from paying fines but has never heard of a fine imposed. Seems no one gives a damn about the water . Down here it's all about development no matter the cost to the resources