nontypical
Ten Pointer
They started hunting yetYep......
They started hunting yetYep......
I worked for NC for 7 years then went to work for the feds.NC or SC
I know who to go to with questions about regs then.I worked for NC for 7 years then went to work for the feds.
Not really, it has been so long since when I worked for the state we carried two big hard copy GS catalogs in our vehicles to look up the numbers to write down on citations if it was an uncommon one we didn't know. That was back before computers in vehicles. Then I went to the feds. I have been retired from them over 10 years. Much has changed since then. That is exactly why I read the regs digest and look at the online page regularly. I do remember much of the old stuff but quite a bit of that has been amended or completely outdated.I know who to go to with questions about regs then.
They started hunting yet
Even back then it was 16. But you could get tags in the 80s for youth and landowners that were exempt. You just called WRC or went to any license agent, they printed them off on that old ticker tape machine that was forever giving problems.It has been too long since my son started hunting with me but I was thinking that "way back then", the early 80s, there was no such thing as a Big Game Report Card for a youth, or any one else for that reason. As has been discussed here before, after the harvest, you took your deer to the country store or other check in station and registered it. The youth hunted under your supervision without a license until 16 or 18 I think. The deer that they took while underage was registered just like any one else but wasn't required to have a tag. The NCWRC was still able to keep up with the harvests by the registration process and your word was good that the kid had taken the deer. As I said, I don't remember when it changed but just like a lot of things, if you don't keep up and read the regulations EVERY year you can get caught operating on outdated information. And like nccatfisher has stated, the "I thought it was ........" or "I was told that ..............." won't get very far with an enforcement officer.
I can remember 20-30 year old stuff pretty good. What I eat for supper yesterday is a whole nuther ballgame.I told you my memory was fading. LOL. I think the 60s had something to do with that. Too much Rock and Roll.
Somehow I figured that. You got a pretty strong opinion about something you haven’t done. Have you ever helped her reel a fish in or bait the hook or cast?Nope. I don’t hunt anymore either. Just surf fish these days. She doesn’t get to go much with school schedule but occasionally if we summer vacation at the beach. Some times she man’s her own rod. Some times I pass one off while she’s doing kid stuff and I get bit.
As has been discussed here before, after the harvest, you took your deer to the country store or other check in station and registered it. The youth hunted under your supervision without a license until 16 or 18 I think. The deer that they took while underage was registered just like any one else but wasn't required to have a tag. The NCWRC was still able to keep up with the harvests by the registration process and your word was good that the kid had taken the deer.
Somehow I figured that. You got a pretty strong opinion about something you haven’t done. Have you ever helped her reel a fish in or bait the hook or cast?
Technically they were supposed to get tags from license agents. Cooperator agents were instructed to write up the kill if they didn't have their own tags or if it was a landowner and they didn't have tags and either write "youth" or "landowner" across it. It was their (WRCs) stance that it was better to have the deer reported than not and it wasn't the cooperator agents place one way or another to get in the middle about not having a tag as they had no athority.That is the way I recall it happening in the '90's. Not sure if that was the correct way, but that's the way I saw it done. You went to a physical check station, told them the kid killed it, and they registered it. Back then there wasn't a BGRC, there were tags. You may have been supposed to get youth tags, but you didn't use the adult tags. They have since made it much more clear how it should be done.
my 5 year old is a better fisherman
That’s what it’s all about right there....my 5 year old grandson is a hoot fishing,,,so excited,,,,and loud (loves singing and hearing his voice echo) but lucky is the word,,,that boy catches fish
but his brother (10 years old) beat him last night,,,but they both had fun
I don't like reading that much. Except the Bible.
Nope. I don’t hunt anymore either. Just surf fish these days. She doesn’t get to go much with school schedule but occasionally if we summer vacation at the beach. Some times she man’s her own rod. Some times I pass one off while she’s doing kid stuff and I get bit.
Make no mistake about it, I love my kids enough to spend time with them. Hunting is my hobby, they may never like it as much as I do. It's my job to find what they like and support them at it.hat since you love hunting enough to involve your children
Why, we had some pretty good comments for him when he was. LMAOMust not comment on @Justin not hunting.
Still, I repeat, if my kid uses one of my tags, how is that not still managing big game resources?
Data is useless if it's not accurate. For best management, they need to know how many hunters are actively hunting and who is shooting that deer. That way, when they go to make a change like going from 4 buck "tags" to 2, they will be able to better predict how that will affect the resource. They will know the breakdown of youth hunters vs. adult hunters and their rates of contribution to the harvest. If you let 2 sons shoot bucks on your tags, and you ended up filling all 4 in the eastern zone, it looks like you are a very successful hunter, and your buck harvest would be cut in half by going to 2 bucks. If your sons either start using their own tags or "graduate" to adult status, they change the numbers. As far as the state knew, only one person was shooting those deer, and there were actually 3. Regulation changes are made slowly, and they aren't just for this year, but for the future.
Another example is turkey tags. It's very useful for the state to understand how many hunters fill 1 tag vs. 2 vs. none, and what the success rate is. There's more to management than just the total harvest for the state. The more they can break it down, the better they can analyze what is going on. That's the same reason why they ask you the county, private/game land, weapon, sex, etc.
Now that makes since. Thanks!Data is useless if it's not accurate. For best management, they need to know how many hunters are actively hunting and who is shooting that deer. That way, when they go to make a change like going from 4 buck "tags" to 2, they will be able to better predict how that will affect the resource. They will know the breakdown of youth hunters vs. adult hunters and their rates of contribution to the harvest. If you let 2 sons shoot bucks on your tags, and you ended up filling all 4 in the eastern zone, it looks like you are a very successful hunter, and your buck harvest would be cut in half by going to 2 bucks. If your sons either start using their own tags or "graduate" to adult status, they change the numbers. As far as the state knew, only one person was shooting those deer, and there were actually 3. Regulation changes are made slowly, and they aren't just for this year, but for the future.
Another example is turkey tags. It's very useful for the state to understand how many hunters fill 1 tag vs. 2 vs. none, and what the success rate is. There's more to management than just the total harvest for the state. The more they can break it down, the better they can analyze what is going on. That's the same reason why they ask you the county, private/game land, weapon, sex, etc.