HotSoup
Old Mossy Horns
Of course they passed a 70/30, not listening one bit to public comment.
You do understand how the 9 seats are structured on the mfc?I wish the public had some say on who was appointed to the commission OR had some sort of vote regarding laws. Hopefully some of the older commissioners that lean heavily towards commercial will be replaced in the coming years. I do not see any progress being able to be made given the current make up.
You do understand how the 9 seats are structured on the mfc?
Usually when folks talk about replacing members that lean one way or the other, they don't realize each seat represents a sector of the users of the resource, and as such gets replaced by another with skin in the game, so to say.From my statement where did you see that I do not understand that?
Usually when folks talk about replacing members that lean one way or the other, they don't realize each seat represents a sector of the users of the resource, and as such gets replaced by another with skin in the game, so to say.
What progress would you like to see made if the rec side were to "pack the court" of the mfc?
That's quite the list on the heels of your purpose and integrity statement just one sentence prior.My comment was directed at the "at large" members who have a track record of siding with the commercial industry. I made no wish to "pack the court" as you say, That would defeat the purpose and integrity of the commission. However, it has been frustrating to sit on the side lines and never see a significant change in the management of our coastal fisheries. Specifically, I would like to see a more evenly dispersed allotment for commercial and recreational flounder, stringent regulation of the inshore trawling industry and the ban of small mesh gillnets.
That's quite the list on the heels of your purpose and integrity statement just one sentence prior.
It is the purpose without a doubt. I believe its FRA97 that states the mfc must manage the resource for both sides, not just the rec side.Please feel free to elaborate. Is not the purpose of the commission to protect our fishery for the fairness of everyone? How is the current allotment fair to everyone?
It is the purpose without a doubt. I believe its FRA97 that states the mfc must manage the resource for both sides, not just the rec side.
Im not sure you want to go down the fair allotment path. That sure looks like a slippery slope, given the recs out catch comm side on a right good number of species. Once you start righting perceived inequities do we stop at your definition of fair or go by a true 50/50 split all the way across the board.?
Where's the real data on rec harvest?Yeah and commercial gets tokeep 75 trout per day where as rec can keep 4....
A very good point was made. While trip tickets give numbers for fish sold, what about the 2/3rds of them that don't report, the ones whom operate and don't sell, etc.
Where's the real data on rec harvest?
Heck, we as recs dont have any real data on our take other than a few samples at public ramps fed into algorithms that extrapolate that data and apply it across the board.
You do remember how we got to 4 specks don't ya. ?
Looks like you need to start teaching those folks to flounder fishReal data, well..I know very few good flounder fisherman.
I'll give you this data on the licenses in my family and neighbors at the beach
Me 18
Brother 0
His FIL 0
SIL 0
Nephew 0
Neighbor 1
Neighbor 0
Neighbor 0
Neighbor 2
Neighbor 0
Yep.....we absolutely slay them.
It is the purpose without a doubt. I believe its FRA97 that states the mfc must manage the resource for both sides, not just the rec side.
Im not sure you want to go down the fair allotment path. That sure looks like a slippery slope, given the recs out catch comm side on a right good number of species. Once you start righting perceived inequities do we stop at your definition of fair or go by a true 50/50 split all the way across the board.?
Let it be known that it wasn’t Omega (even though I’m firmly against their practice), that wiped out the stripers, and it wasn’t commercial fishing either. Every slack jawed, CCA cadet, window licker that could get across the bar was running 2 and 3 a days.
I think everyone has some share in the blame. It's completely unrealistic to place the blame on one side. The meat haul attitude needs to change as does the the commercial fishing practices / quota. We are never going to fix anything pointing fingers at one another.
It always goes from purpose, integrity, and fairness talk, to all about the disparities of economic value between user groups. MFC is bound by law to manage for both user groups period.Ill break it down for you for the yearly averages over the 10 year period
Average Yearly Commercial Added economic impact: $ 14,665,220
Average Yearly Commercial estimated employment impact: 1,387
Average Yearly Recreational Added economic impact: $ 133,192,104
Average Yearly Recreational estimated employment impact: 2,153
I live in the center of the state. Used to make it down to the coast a few times a year to fish. I can’t claim all the throw back stuff like other folks can. As a family, if it was legal, it hit the cooler.
As far as the new flounder rules...it seems a little restricting. Call it poaching if you want to....but if a man wants flounder for dinner, I’m not the one to stand in their way.
data is out there showing the problems predators have on other wildlife (coyotes). Can anyone show data regarding the diminishing flounder?
Why are there not separate regulations by species? Trouble identifying species? I thought the same about black bass in fresh water, but the the NCWRC sure changed that. Why can't the MFC, do the same. I have caught plenty of summer flounder in NC.
If it’s like duck hunting it’s probably more for the wardens. I’ve met more than my fair share of wardens that couldn’t tell you the difference between a hen mallard and a black duck.Yep, they think the average joe cant tell em apart well enough to avoid a ticket. Nc probably has more SW anglers from out of state than in state. From an enforcement standpoint, i can understand it. However, it still pisses me off to be told since joe from pa can't tell em apart, you cant keep em.
So the rec limit is now reduced , does that mean that the commercial limit is reduced as well?
The quota is reduced for everyone.So the rec limit is now reduced , does that mean that the commercial limit is reduced as well?