CRC
Old Mossy Horns
Looks like the WRC is drafting a catfish management plan and it will be discussed at the WRC's December meetings
Catfish
1) Establish an exception to the general statewide regulation for catfish in the Pee Dee River downstream of Blewett Falls Dam to the South Carolina state line and all tributaries by implementing a daily creel limit of five catfish in combination.
Justification: This reach of the Pee Dee River supports a popular catfish fishery, and anglers have expressed concern about overharvest, especially given the amount of habitat available varies substantially with flow from dam releases. The proposed daily creel limit for catfish would prevent excessive harvest. 15A NCAC 10C .0401 Manner of Taking Nongame Fishes (pages 32 and 33)
Look at the trout they jump through their butt for that aren't native. Doesn't mean they aren't a great recreational fishery.surprised they are even considering a limit on the Lower Pee Dee as Most of the Catfish there are NON NATIVE and they are trying to to Protect the Endangered Robust Redhorse not to mention the many species of anadromous fish that use this river and need help.
I for one luv to catch big cats but this makes no sense when it comes to the health of the river.
That is true but none of those waters has anadromous. Fish. I would bet you that If the biologist had the final say that the limit isn't happening but public pressure can change things and lots of times public pressure trumps common sense and sound biology.Or walleye in places like Lake James and Lake Gaston.................
You might be surprised, one of the biologist fishes with me regularly and has always said that the large breeders needed some type of protection. In fact 20 years ago he stood up in one of meetings and said as much prior to him being a biologist. It went over like a fart in church at that time.That is true but none of those waters has anadromous. Fish. I would bet you that If the biologist had the final say that the limit isn't happening but public pressure can change things and lots of times public pressure trumps common sense and sound biology.
That is true but none of those waters has anadromous. Fish. I would bet you that If the biologist had the final say that the limit isn't happening but public pressure can change things and lots of times public pressure trumps common sense and sound biology.
As I said I bet you won't find a one speak against trout regs, most of them are as native as kudzu.well the ones that want protection for a non native fish imho are not doing there profession any good. Damn the fish that were here and need help. I have had one "get on to me" for releasing them. maybe in 30 years when the Big head carp gets here the biologist will want them. "hey they are fun to shoot out of the back of Jon boats"
That would be a sensible way to go about it.TN I think has it right. No limit on cats but only one fish allowed over 34”.
And that’s with a commercial fishery in several of the lakes. I helped a grad student from a different university a couple years ago. He was looking at size comparisons in blues and channels in commercial versus non commercially fished lakes. I never read his thesis completely but he did tell me that the lakes that were commercially fished had much better growth rates among blues and channels than the lakes where comm fishing was not allowed due to advisories.That would be a sensible way to go about it.
Pay lake harvest and glory riders that throw them in the ditch once they have rode them around in the back of the tuck to they stink hurt the big fish much more than anything here.And that’s with a commercial fishery in several of the lakes. I helped a grad student from a different university a couple years ago. He was looking at size comparisons in blues and channels in commercial versus non commercially fished lakes. I never read his thesis completely but he did tell me that the lakes that were commercially fished had much better growth rates among blues and channels than the lakes where comm fishing was not allowed due to advisories.
FRANKFORT, Ky. (Oct. 4, 2018) —
The Kentucky Fish and Wildlife Commission has proposed new regulations establishing statewide limits on trophy catfish, and proposed tightening existing regulations on the commercial harvest of large catfish and their use by pay lakes. Commission members, at their Sept. 28 quarterly meeting, also approved three wildlife studies of bears, bobcats and otters.
A proposal approved by the commission would limit anglers to one trophy catfish of each species a day. This trophy regulation, already in place on the Ohio River, would expand statewide. Anglers could keep one blue and one flathead catfish 35 inches or longer, and one channel catfish 28 inches or longer each day. Anglers could still keep an unlimited number of catfish shorter than trophy length, except on waters with special regulations for catfish.